Post-Quantum Compliance Infrastructure
DainamiqQuantum computers break one thing in your network. We replace exactly that.
Cryptographic infrastructure was set-and-forget for decades. Now it has to be agile, auditable, and quantum-safe at once — and nothing in the stack delivers all three. Dainamiq is the missing middle layer: post-quantum compliance today, quantum-hardware security when a link is worth it, from one vendor-neutral orchestration plane. Your encryption is fine; your key exchange is the piece a quantum computer breaks — we swap it out without touching the rest of your network.
The crypto stack today
The gap isn’t a missing algorithm. It’s a missing layer.
The big players are folding post-quantum crypto into their own boxes. Real, and it locks you to that vendor. What no one is building is the two horizontal layers above them: a vendor-neutral orchestration plane, and the compliance-certification layer on top. Your HSM vendor won’t build the neutral layer above their own box. It works against their lock-in. And nobody owns certification yet, while the standards firm up.
Scan, remediate, and certify your readiness in one place — as the standards firm up.
One vendor-neutral layer over every silo: PQC, QKD, QRNG and classical as policy-selectable sources — no silent degradation, a provable audit trail, crypto-agility. Your vendors won't build it — a neutral layer across all of them works against their lock-in.
Thales · Entrust · Utimaco · AWS CloudHSM (all five) · Juniper · Fortinet · Palo Alto. Available now — and where the big players fold PQC into their own box. That's a feature, and it's lock-in.
PQC will be everywhere: every vendor will ship it. The neutral layer that orchestrates it across your whole estate, provably, is the part none of them will sell you.
The clock is running
Post-quantum key establishment.
Post-quantum digital signatures.
Executive Order 14412 (June 2026) sets two binding deadlines. The mandate sets your clock; the neutral layer keeps you from trading one vendor’s lock-in for another’s.
Check your edge
See where your public edge stands against the deadlines.
Check any domain
Point our probe at any site and see where its public edge stands against the 2030 and 2031 EO deadlines. A failing result means adversaries can record its traffic today and break it later.
This checks the public web edge — the TLS that terminates your site (often a CDN or load balancer) — not your backbone, email, or internal key exchange. It's the accessible proxy for the same threat.
Is this you?
You already have the problem. The only question is your timeline.
You have a mandate, or a board asking
EO 14412, CNSA 2.0, NIST FIPS 203, DORA, PCI DSS 4.0. Someone wants your post-quantum plan, with a date on it.
You're a federal contractor or agency
A PQC migration plan is due under OMB M-26-15 / EO 14412: key establishment by 2030, signatures by 2031. Post-quantum and provable, on a federal clock.
You run sensitive traffic over leased or dark fiber
Settlement, trading, inter-datacenter replication, backhaul, between sites, over fiber you don't fully control.
Your secrets have a long shelf life
Financial, health, IP, or state data still sensitive in 10–20 years is exactly what harvest-now-decrypt-later is banking on.
You can't rip and replace
You run IPsec at scale and need post-quantum key exchange without touching the gateways you already own.
PQC now, quantum when ready
A key-management entity that sits beside your gateway.
We deliver on the PQC mandate today, and extend to quantum hardware on the links where physics-layer security is worth it — without rebuilding your platform. Dainamiq answers your gateway’s ETSI 014 request with post-quantum keys everywhere (ML-KEM, NIST FIPS 203, no special hardware; 768 baseline, 1024 for CNSA 2.0 tiers), and with quantum-physical keys on the links where you’ve installed quantum hardware. Same tunnel, same encryption; the keys change.
Post-quantum, everywhere
Software only, every site. ML-KEM key delivery over the ETSI 014 interface — selectable strength (768, or 1024 for national-security tiers), no quantum hardware required.
Add quantum where it’s worth it
Install quantum hardware on your crown-jewel links and those sites upgrade automatically. One platform serves both tiers.
Your firewall likely already speaks our API: Juniper, Fortinet, and Palo Alto embed the ETSI 014 client in firmware, no agent or sidecar. The quantum tier is proven by a self-healing QKD engine holding mid-40s Kbps over metro fiber — evidence the architecture handles real quantum-layer speed and complexity for your crown-jewel links. See the integration detail →
What you get
Built for the people who have to prove it, not just claim it.
Crypto-agility: swap algorithms, touch nothing
Your engineers import one library and stop thinking about the crypto layer. Need FIPS 203, a different tier, a new algorithm when the standard moves? The swap happens in the plane, transparently. When standards change — and they will — it's a config change, not a re-architecture.
No silent downgrade: it fails safe
If a link degrades or a key source is unreachable, Dainamiq never quietly hands back a weaker key. It delivers the tier you required or refuses and says why — your gateway's policy governs from there. Silent fallback is how downgrade attacks work; we designed it out.
A provenance record for every key
Each key carries how it was derived, which nodes handled it, at what posture, and when. An auditor can reconstruct any key's full lifecycle — the difference between “we use quantum-safe keys” and “here is the evidence.” The audit trail your mandate demands, produced automatically.
One deployment, graduated by sensitivity
Settlement traffic gets the highest tier; audit logs a lower one; monitoring the baseline, all from the same API and policy engine. Each request states what it needs and gets exactly that, or an explicit refusal.
Harvest-now protection on your backbone
On the links that warrant it, the vulnerable key-exchange step is replaced with one grounded in physics, not a hardness assumption. The keys feed AES-256 — which was never the problem. No step in the chain is left for a future quantum computer to break.
Eavesdropping shows up. Tap the quantum fiber between two sites and the error rate spikes, a consequence of measuring a quantum state, not a software heuristic. Classical networks can’t offer this.
Vendor-neutral by design. Any HSM, any entanglement source, any of the sources behind the plane: swappable, no anchor-vendor dependency. As the market matures, you swap a driver, not the platform. No lock-in, including to us.
Start with two sites
Quantum where it’s worth it. Post-quantum everywhere else. Automatic upgrades.
Quantum hardware is scarce and bound to fiber paths. You won’t run quantum links to every branch, and you don’t need to. Deploy a Dainamiq KME at each end of your two most sensitive, dark-fiber-connected sites; those two now have quantum-secured key exchange. Every other site gets post-quantum keys: ML-KEM-768, NIST-standardized (FIPS 203) — through the same API. As you add quantum links, sites upgrade themselves — no software change, no re-architecture.
Same software at every site, same API at every gateway; the quantum hardware is the variable, never the platform.
The honest version
What this does, and what it doesn’t.
It secures the link, not the endpoint
The quantum guarantee holds on the fiber between two key-management entities. Inside your own LAN, conventional security takes over. We protect the hop you can't fully control, the one crossing cities over shared fiber.
Trusted relay is a real trust boundary
Where two sites lack a direct quantum link, a third bridges them and handles key material. We contain it — the bridge never sees plaintext, the relay hop is itself quantum-encrypted — but it's an honest limit until quantum repeaters exist commercially. They don't yet.
Post-quantum is the floor, not a compromise
ML-KEM-768 solves the same vulnerable step QKD does, using math instead of physics. It's the responsible baseline. The quantum tier adds a guarantee that rests on no hardness belief. Both are real protection; they differ in the basis of the claim.
We're early, and we'll say so
The platform is built and demonstrated against physics-based simulation. Validation against production quantum hardware is ahead of us, not behind us.
We practice what we sell
The seal in the corner is live.
The connection you’re reading this over negotiated a post-quantum key exchange at the edge. The seal in the corner measures your own browser’s handshake with us, live — green means your browser completed a post-quantum handshake; muted means it didn’t.